Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Monday, 1st December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the NS-City site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Animal rights protesters angry at police policy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2008
A ROW has broken out between animal rights campaigners and police over a request to close a road during their annual demonstration at an animal testing lab.
Members of the Stop Wickham Animal Testing group have referred the case to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

In previous years protesters have been able to march through Wickham village to the Wickham Animal Laboratories, with part of
the A334 closed off for several minutes to let them through.

The march attracts more than 100 people and features a heavy police presence.

Last year for the first time, Winchester City Council, at Hampshire Constabulary's request, issued them with an order to pay £400 for the closure. Campaigners are angry as they claim a road closure during the Boxing Day Hursley and Hambledon Hunt was done for free.

Activist Jeanette McClunan, of Corhampton, said: 'Why should we have to pay £400 for a policeman for 15 minutes when there are going to be so many police officers there anyway?

'We feel like we've been dealt with in an arrogant and antagonistic way.'

A letter sent to the campaigners by Inspector James Pegler, and seen by The News, explains the IPCC will not be pursuing the complaint as it is not against an individual officer's conduct.

This year's march is due to take place on September 20. Protesters have not asked for permission to use the road.



The full article contains 240 words and appears in NS-City newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2008 11:52 AM
  • Source: NS-City
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Johnny ,

Fareham 26/06/2008 18:13:19
'Stop Wickham Animal Testing' sounds too negative, they should rename themselves to 'Start Wickham Human Testing'. After all, that's what will happen if they get their way.
2

LIndylooloo,

Midlands 28/06/2008 10:33:01
Johnny, That is totally untrue and is simply your own assumption based on a complete lack of knowledge. Where do people like you get your daft ideas from? Aren't you aware of all the other methods of non animal and non human testing that already exist, never mind future developments, (we are in the 21st century after all)? In fact testing is ALREADY done on humans. What do you think human trials are? Animal rights want safer testing and testing on animals has shown not to be safe for humans repeatedly! and it has also shown not safe to test on humans after passing as 'safe' on animals either! At least do a bit of research before you comment. You make yourself look foolish with your lack of knowledge.

3

Midlands,

UK 06/08/2008 09:31:16
Whatever people are protesting for or against we should all support the right to protest, if we don’t then we end up with a police state. One of the roles of the police is actually to facilitate peaceful protest, that people should have to effectively pay to protest is disgusting. I think the police and IPCC should be ashamed of themselves.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.